John Wesley has been often criticized for his lack of a developed, systematic theological doctrine. However, in analyzing the works of Wesley, one can find theological arguments for certain things, at least. In reading his fiftieth sermon, "The Use of Money," John Wesley presents three rules of Christian prudence: "Having, First, gained all you can, and, secondly saved all you can, then 'give all you can.'" In regards to the first two rules, Wesley does not seem to have any real theological basis for "gaining all you can" and "saving all you can," at least when considered exclusively.
Wesley does, however, present a theological argument to "give all you can." Wesley said, when the Possessor of heaven and earth brought you into being, and placed you in this world, he placed you here not as a proprietor, but a steward."He continues, "And he has told you, in the most clear and express terms, how you are to employ it for him, in such a manner, that it may be all an holy sacrifice, acceptable through Christ Jesus." The act of "giving all you can" is sacrificial in nature and ultimately being a good steward for God and God's Kingdom. Consequently, God "has promised to reward with an eternal weight of glory." From a theological perspective, "giving all you can" is part of God's will for us, and also (at least in part) how we are able to receive eternal glory.
My question is then, with a pretty solid theological argument for the third rule of Christian prudence, is there any theological basis for the first two rule in and of themselves? Or are they truly only able to work as God intended as a collective set of rules? In another light, I ask who was intended to hear this sermon? Is this a refutation of the prosperity gospel? What motivated Wesley to write this specific sermon?
No comments:
Post a Comment