According to the text, the Aldersgate Experience, it is noticeable that John Wesley received advice from various people. The most influential person among them was Peter Böhler. Whenever John Wesley was counseled by Peter Böhler, he commented him on the documents (p. 53, 54, 56, 64, 65). These frequent mentions represent the critical impact of Peter affected on Wesley. The problem I have in mind is in regard to the role of Peter. Peter seems to be shaded and neglected by the work of Wesley. It is undeniable fact that, at least in this document, Wesley had been formed his theological and spiritual thoughts through Peter's advice.
On the one hand, this fact reminds the significance of the record. Hatch, in his article, points out that "Methodists were inveterate record keepers and journal writers, and they pioneered the widespread use of the religious press." John Wesley, in my opinion, was not only a great preacher but also a great recorder. This feature might have made him be received more attention.
On the one hand, this fact reminds the significance of the record. Hatch, in his article, points out that "Methodists were inveterate record keepers and journal writers, and they pioneered the widespread use of the religious press." John Wesley, in my opinion, was not only a great preacher but also a great recorder. This feature might have made him be received more attention.
No comments:
Post a Comment